Post by AlunPost by priceYou make an interesting point about the being fully loyal or not. But
if dual nationality is a way to predict loyalty, it's certainly not
going to be as accurate today, in the UK, as religious identity. By
which I refer to Muslims and Jews, one of which is possibly to have an
international Islamic state as a first loyalty, while the other will
possibly be primarily orientated towards Israel. I think we can see
this with the Jews in the USA and the Muslims in the UK. Dual
nationality was probably more important a few years ago.
Post by billybroncoPost by AlunI assume it was a job requiring a security clearance? Dual
nationality could be relevant in that case.
Yes it was. Why is Dual nationality relevant in a security clearance case?.
It depends on the type of security clearance, and the type of work.
In some cases, the fact that a person has dual nationality may cast a
doubt as to whether or not he will be fully loyal or that he
may find himself in a position where he may not want to always act in
the best interest of his employer.
I'm in the US, although from the UK. I actually think it illogical that
someone who is a naturalised American can get security clearance while I
can't. If someone is willing to change their citizenship, I would seriously
doubt their loyalty to _any_ country. At least I am a loyal citizen of an
ally.
(All countries are different)
In my case, I'm a dual citizen. I'm US born (and therefore
a US citizen), and I also have British citizenship through
my British mother. Interestingly enough, US guidelines
would not disqualify me from a US security clearance as long
as I had never actively made use of my British citizenship.
But because I actually do hold a British passport (in addition
to a US passport), and I have travelled on my British
passport (albeit only to enter the UK), I would probably
not qualify for a US security clearance. I don't know
whether Britain would give me a security clearance or not.
Cheers,
Stephen